医心网  >  独家资讯  >   正文

ARMYDA-4:预加负荷剂量的氯吡格雷,安全但没有进一步的益处

发布于:2007-11-05 15:51    

ARMYDA-4: Preloading Clopidogrel Safe but Confers No Added Benefit

  ARMYDA-4试验结果显示:对于长期服用氯吡格雷的患者,PCI术前追加600mg负荷剂量的氯吡格雷并没有进一步的益处。

 

  意大利Rome Biomedical Campus心脏病学系教授――Germano DiSciasco博士公布了抗血小板治疗减少血管成形术中的心肌损伤的研究结果。

 

  该试验为前瞻性、多中心、随机双盲试验,DiSciasco和他的同事发现,预加600mg负荷剂量氯吡格雷的180名患者(8%)与安慰剂组的180名患者(7%)相比,30天的心肌梗死率没有差别;在这两组患者中也没有发生死亡或TVR。(如图1)

 

  心肌损伤标记物

 

  “术后增加的心肌损伤标志物如肌酸激酶MB和肌钙蛋白MI,两组基本相同。”DiSciasco说。“同样地,两组在PCI术后心肌损伤标记物峰值也没有明显差别。”

 

  两组都没有发生重大出血事件。小范围出血率每组是4%。在研究开始,血小板聚集数相似,但随着PCI术进行而增加。应用负荷剂量氯吡格雷的患者血小板活性稍小,但是和安慰剂组比较没有明显差别。DiSciasco说,第2、6、24小时,两组血小板聚集基本相同。


  即时血小板聚集分析检测显示,两组的血小板活性没有明显差别。但是,负荷剂量给药没有增加出血风险。因此,长期服用氯吡格雷的患者,在术前无需给予氯吡格雷,也能安全进行PCI手术。

 

  ARMYDA-2

 

  ARMYDA-4是ARMYDA-2的随访。在ARMYDA-2试验中,给予600mg氯吡格雷的患者,30天死亡、MRI和TVR的发生率为4%,而给予300mg氯吡格雷的患者,其发生率为12%。“但是,我们并不知道这些研究能否促进临床应用。因此,我们设计了ARMYDA-4研究。”DiSciasco说。

 

  ARMYDA-4研究入选464名患者,在PCI手术前4-8小时随机给药:230名给予600mg氯吡格雷,234名患者给予安慰剂。血管成形术后,研究者排除了104名患者。两组患者中30%有糖尿病,每组近40%为非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者。每组患者2/3病变类型为B2/C,近40%患者接受DES治疗。DiSciasco说,每组约10%患者应用了糖蛋白IIb/Ⅲa抑制剂。

杰克逊维尔的佛罗里达医科大学Dominick Angiolillo博士,对ARMYDA-4试验进行了评价:“当研究者给予患者负荷剂量氯吡格雷时,两组并没有差别。”

 

  “然而,也有人提醒我们,在介入手术过程中对血小板功能进行分析,结果可能被血小板功能分析本身所影响。” Angiolillo说。

 

Pre-PCI loading of 600 mg of clopidogrel does not provide additional benefit in patients already receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy, according to ARMYDA-4 trial results.

Germano DiSciasco, MD, professor,director and chair of cardiology at the University of Rome Biomedical Campus in Italy, presented the results of the Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage during Angioplasty trial results on Monday.
    
 In the prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, DiSciasco and his colleagues found no difference in the 30-day MI rate between the 180 patients assigned the 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel (8%) and the 180 patients assigned placebo (7%). There were no deaths or target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) in either of the 2 patient arms (Figure 1).

 

Myocardial injury markers

The post-procedural increase of markers of myocardial injury was “essentially the same in both arms,as far as creatine kinase-MB and troponin-I are concerned,” DiSciasco said. “Likewise, post-PCI peak levels of markers of myocardial injury were also not signifi cantly different between [the 2 arms].”

 

No major bleeding events occurred in either group; the minor bleeding rate was 4% in each group. Platelet aggregation was similar at the beginning of the study but increased during PCI. Patients assigned the clopidogrel loading dose had slightly less platelet reactivity, but it was not signifi cant compared with placebo. Platelet aggregation was essentially the same between the 2 groups at 2, 6, and 24 hours, DiSciasco said (Figure 2).

 

“Point-of-care aggregometry testing shows no signifi cant differences in platelet reactivity in the 2 arms;however, there is no increased bleeding risk observed with the ‘reload’ approach. Therefore, patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy can safely undergo PCI without the need.

 

ARMYDA-2

ARMYDA-4 is a follow-up to ARMYDA-2. In ARMYDA-2, patients assigned 600 mg of clopidogrel had a 4% rate of death, MRI and TVR at 30 days compared with the 12% rate in patients assigned a 300-mg dose.“However, we didn’t know whether these cornerstones could improve the clinical outcome. Therefore we designed the ARMYDA-4 study,”DiSciasco said.

 

The ARMYDA-4 study initially enrolled 464 patients who were randomized 4 to 8 hours before PCI: 230 patients to the 600-mg load of clopidogrel and 234 patients to placebo. After angiography, the investigators excluded 104 patients. Thirty percent of patients in both groups had diabetes, and approximately 40% of each group had non-STEMI acute coronary syndrome. Two-thirds of patients in each group had lesion type B2/C, and approximately 40% in each group received a DES. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in about 10% of patients in each group, DiSciasco said.

Dominick Angiolillo, MD, PhD, postdoctoral associate at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Jacksonville, presented the critical appraisal of the ARMYDA-4 trial. “Investigators did not fi nd any differences between the 2 groups when reloading patients,” he said.

 

“Nevertheless, we’re cautioned that the platelet function analysis was performed in the surrounding interventional procedure; therefore,results could have been infl uenced by the platelet function analysis itself,” Angiolillo said.



来源: 医心网
上一篇:重磅|中国自主研发心血管OCT系统正式上市 助力PCI精准治疗
下一篇:Interceptor plus远端保护装置与已批准治疗SVG的装置具有相似的安全性和有效性
评论列表:(评论 0 )以下网友评论只代表网友个人观点,不代表本站观点。
最短5个字
登录     注册