医心网  >  独家资讯  >   正文

[TCT2008]DES,CABG对于左主干治疗其死亡、心梗发生率具有可比性

发布于:2008-10-16 18:26    

DES, CABG Comparable for Death, MI in Left Main Disease 

 

DES,CABG对于左主干治疗其死亡、心梗发生率具有可比性


根据Seung-Jung Park发布的数据,左主干的DES介入治疗与CABG的临床结果硬性终点(包括死亡率和MI)类似,但是DES置入的TLR和TVR率可能更高。


Park和他的同事进行的注册研究入选147例病人(60高风险患者和87名低风险的患者),他们都曾进行左主干介入治疗。随访时间平均886天。在此期间,4名高风险患者死于心源性死亡,低风险的患者中无心源性死亡。


Park说,研究证明了左主干介入治疗的受益,但是还存在4个问题:开口和体部病变、远端分叉病变、IVUS指导操作以及支架与冠状动脉搭桥术的对比——Park的研究检验了每一个问题。


开口和体部病变


Park说注册研究数据表明低死亡率、TLR和TVR率:在为期三年的随访中,有四例发生心源性死亡,一例TLR,7例TVR。注册研究数据还表明,三年的随访晚期支架血栓发生率很低。“这些研究结果表明,开口和体部左主干支架是可以被临床所接受的。”Park说。


远端分叉病变


Park和他的同事们还检查了远端左主干分叉支架置入术。Park说:“目前的结果表明,无保护左主干分叉狭窄中植入DES是安全有效的,与多支架植入相比,单支架置入在技术上比较容易,而且似乎能更有效地改善左旋支病变的长期效果”。根据Park所说,在左旋支病变的病例中,无论Kissing支架还是Crush技术都是可行的,并且可获得可接受的长期成果。


IVUS指导操作


注册研究数据显示IVUS指导的DES操作,比血管造影术指导的操作,其死亡率更低(4.4% 比16%; P=0.048)。IVUS指导下裸金属支架置入比血管造影指导下裸金属支架的置入,其死亡率更低,但差异无统计学意义(8.6 %比10.8%; P =. 346 )。


支架术 vs. CABG


一些研究已经比较了支架与CABG的结果。Park提到最近Chieffo等人的研究指出,DES治疗比CABG治疗的患者一年后死亡率和MI都较低,但无显著性差异(见图)。


然而,根据同样的数据,DES治疗的病人比CABG治疗的病人其TLR和TVR率都高。Park指出,其他研究显示出类似的结果。“注册和随机临床试验的数据均清晰的表明,在硬性终点方面,DES与CABG的临床结果差异不大,但是与更高的靶血管血运重建率有关。”


SYNTAX试验结果


法国Marie-Claude Morice教授在周一发布了SYNTAX试验结果,他说,一年时行PCI术(15.8%)的患者其心血管不良事件率与CABG(13.7%)的相似。


SYNTAX试验包括两个欧洲和北美试验组。在欧洲,1867人进行CABG治疗,648人进行PCI治疗。在北美,813人进行CABG治疗,212人进行PCI治疗。SYNTAX结果同时也表明,孤立左主干或左主干与单血管的患者采用支架术后也出现阳性结果。“然而,对于左主干和两到三支血管病变的患者,医生应该考虑采用CABG治疗。”Morice说。


 

(《医心评论》编辑 朱婧 翻译 刘瑞琦 校对)

 

(来源:www.tctmd.com

 

DES, CABG Comparable for Death, MI in Left Main Disease 

By TCT Daily Staff

 

Left main interventional treatment with DES had comparable clinical outcomes to CABG in hard endpoints that included mortality and MI, but possibly higher rates of TLR and TVR, according to data presented by Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, from the Asan Medical Center at the University of Ulsan in Seoul, South Korea.

 

Park and colleagues enrolled a registry of 147 patients (60 high-risk patients and 87 low-risk patients) who had undergone left main interventional treatment. Patients were followed for an average of 886 days. During the follow-up period, there were four cardiac deaths among the high-risk patients and no cardiac deaths among the low-risk patients.

 

Park said research has demonstrated the benefits of left main interventional treatment but four issues regarding this treatment remain: ostial and shaft lesions, distal bifurcation lesions, IVUS-guided procedures, and stenting vs. CABG. Park’s research examined each of these issues.

 

Ostial, shaft lesions

 

Park said the registry data demonstrated low mortality, TLR, and TVR rates: At three-year follow-up, there were four cardiac deaths, one TLR, and seven TVR procedures. The registry data also indicated a low rate of late stent thrombosis at the three-year follow-up mark.

 

"These findings suggest that ostial and shaft left main stenting would be acceptable for clinical practice," Park said.

 

Distal bifurcation

 

Park and his colleagues also examined distal bifurcation left main stenting. "The present results suggest that DES implantation in unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenoses is safe and effective," Park said.

 

"Compared with complex stentings, single stenting was technically easier and appeared to be more effective in improving long-term outcomes for lesions with normal left circumflex." In cases with diseased left circumflex, both kissing stenting and the crushing technique were feasible with acceptable long-term outcomes, according to Park.

 

IVUS-guided procedures

 

Registry data indicated that IVUS-guided DES procedures were associated with lower mortality rates than angiography-guided procedures (4.4% vs. 16%; P=.048). IVUS-guided bare-metal stent procedures were associated with numerically lower mortality rates than angiography-guided bare-metal procedures, although the difference was not statistically significant (8.6% vs. 10.8%; P=.346).

 

Park said these findings indicate that IVUS guidance should be mandatory in left main stenting with DES.

 

Stenting vs. CABG

 

Several studies have compared the outcomes of stenting vs. CABG. Park referred to recent research from Chieffo et al indicating that mortality and MI rates were numerically lower after one year among patients treated with DES than among those treated with CABG, although the differences were not statistically significant (see Figure).

 

However, according to the same data, the rates of TLR and TVR were higher among patients treated with DES than among those treated with CABG.

 

Park noted that other research has shown similar results. "Data from registry and randomized clinical trials clearly suggest that PCI with a DES has a comparable clinical outcome with CABG in hard end points but [is associated with] higher target revascularization rates," Park said.

 

SYNTAX trial results

 

Marie-Claude Morice, MD, from the Institut Jacques Cartier in Massy, France, presented results from the SYNTAX trial on Monday.

 

In SYNTAX, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at one year was similar between patients treated with PCI (15.8%) and those treated with CABG (13.7%), Morice said.

 

The run-in phase of the SYNTAX trial included arms in Europe and North America. In Europe, the trial included 1,867 patients treated with CABG and 648 patients treated with PCI. In North America, the trial included 813 patients treated with CABG and 212 patients treated with PCI.

 

According to Morice, the SYNTAX results also demonstrated positive outcomes after stenting in patients with isolated left main or left main and single-vessel disease.

 

However, for patients with left main and two- or three-vessel disease, physicians should consider treatment with CABG, Morice said.

 

Disclosures:

Dr. Park reports no relevant conflicts of interest.
Dr. Morice reports no relevant conflicts of interest.


(source:
www.tctmd.com



来源: 医心网
上一篇:重磅|中国自主研发心血管OCT系统正式上市 助力PCI精准治疗
下一篇:[TCT2008]DECLARE-DIABETES研究:2年内TLR率持续性降低
评论列表:(评论 0 )以下网友评论只代表网友个人观点,不代表本站观点。
最短5个字
登录     注册