医心网  >  独家资讯  >   正文

[TCT2008]瓣膜性心脏病:经验影响结果

发布于:2008-10-19 18:23    

瓣膜性心脏病:经验影响结果

(北京安贞医院 苑飞 翻译) 


• 在美国和欧洲进行的可行性研究显示介入治疗效果的提高依赖于术者经验的积累。

经导管主动脉瓣置换的早期研究显示,当医生积累了一定经验后手术并变得更加安全和有效,这一结果是从主要使用Edwards Sapien人工瓣膜的三个研究数据得出。


加拿大温哥华圣保罗医院的John Webb医生展示了在172例患者参加的Vancouver TAVR研究中的发现。在接受经动脉主动脉瓣置换的114例患者中,手术成功率从最初1/3患者的81.6%提高到后2/3患者的97.4%。


相似的,30日死亡率从前1/3患者的13.2%降低到中间1/3患者的10.5%,后1/3患者的死亡率为0。


相对于介入治疗,58例患者的经心尖主动脉瓣置换手术的成功率更高,前1/2患者为96.6%,后1/2患者为100%。30日死亡率从24.1%降低到13.8%。


Webb认为在对瓣膜位置和股动脉入路操作的理解上存在“陡直的学习曲线”,这是早期致残、致死事件发生的主要原因。

欧洲TRAVERSE研究


来自德国莱比锡大学的Thomas Walther医生展示了TRAVERSE可行性研究,该研究对从2004年12月到2008年4月在欧洲进行的经心尖主动脉瓣置换术获得的经验进行评价。


主要围术期并发症包括心尖出血(4.8%),血液动力学不稳定(4.8%)和冠状动脉闭塞或受损(3.6%)。30日随访时主要并发症包括需置入起搏器治疗(5.9%),心衰(5.4%)和需要进行血滤的暂时性肾功能不全(10.1%)。


Walther说经心尖主动脉瓣置换是成功的术式。它是一种非体外循环的微创手术,而且目前非常安全,具有很好的可操作性和低中风风险。通过TRAVERSE研究我们可以看到在心脏外科、心脏内科和麻醉科医生的共同努力下手术结果得到了提高。

 

REVIVAL II研究的教训


得克萨斯州达拉斯的Todd M. Dewey医生在2008年7月发表在《胸外科年鉴》上的文章中对在REVIVAL II可行性研究中获得的经心尖主动脉瓣置换术美国经验进行了讨论。除了对器械进行安全有效性评价外,可行性研究还必须承担着对手术过程进行优化提高的作用。


Dewey医生说:“我们早就知道患者的选择是有限的(根据目前的风险评估工具)。”这些预测因子包括肺疾病、肺气肿等。他说:“研究纳入的患者对于进行心尖主动脉瓣置换术来说风险太高。而在研究开始时我们错误的认为这一手术可以适合任何患者。后来我们很快发现还是有很多患者病情太重了。”他认为应对入选标准进行修改。


公开:

• Webb医生报告是Edwards Lifesciences公司的顾问。
• Walther报告没有任何相关利益冲突。
• Dewey医生是Edwards Lifesciences公司的顾问。

 

(来源:www.tctmd.com


Valvular Heart Disease Summit: Experience Impacts Outcomes

Key Points:


• Feasibility studies in U.S. and Europe indicate percutaneous approaches improve with more operator experience.

By TCT Daily Staff


Early studies of transcatheter aortic valve replacement have demonstrated that the technique is becoming safer and more effective as clinicians learn from initial experiences, according to data from three trials predominantly using the Edwards Sapien THV.


John Webb, MD, of St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, presented findings on 172 patients from the Vancouver TAVR study. In those who underwent transarterial replacement (n=114), procedural success grew from 81.6% in the first tertile to 97.4% in both the second and third tertiles of patients treated.


Similarly, 30-day mortality rates were 13.2% in the first tertile, dropping to 10.5% in the second and 0% in the third tertile.

Procedural success was higher in transapical procedures (n=58): 96.6% for the first half treated and 100% for the latter half. In the same population, 30-day mortality dropped from 24.1% to 13.8% over time.

Webb noted a "steep learning curve" in understanding valve positioning and femoral access, major sources of morbidity, and mortality early in the series.

European TRAVERSE

The TRAVERSE feasibility study, presented by Thomas Walther, MD, of the University of Leipzig, Germany, assessed the European experience with transapical aortic valve replacement from December 2004 to April 2008 (see Table).

The main perioperative complications were apical bleeding (4.8%), hemodynamic instability (4.8%), and coronary occlusion/impingement (3.6%). At 30-day follow-up, the most common complications were new pacemaker (5.9%), cardiac failure (5.4%), and temporary renal failure requiring hemofiltration (10.1%).

Walther said that TAVR was a "clear success story. It’s a minimally invasive off-pump and very safe procedure right now," with excellent steerability and low stroke risk. Through the learning experience of TRAVERSE, researchers have improved results, particularly by employing a team approach that involves cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and anesthesiologists, he said.

 

Lessons from REVIVAL II

Todd M. Dewey, MD, of Medical City Dallas in Texas, discussed the U.S. experience with transapical AVR as captured by the REVIVAL II feasibility study, previously published in the July 2008 issue of the Annals of Thoracic Surgery. In addition to measuring the safety and efficacy of the device, feasibility studies also must perfect the procedure itself, Dewey said.

"We learned early on that patient selection can be limited [by current risk assessment tools]," he said. Predictive factors include pulmonary disease, emphysema, and frailty. "There are patients that are too high risk for transapical AVR. When we started, we thought we had a tool [that] could treat everybody. We quickly learned that there are patients who are still too sick," Dewey said, adding that his group subsequently modified the selection criteria.

Disclosures:

• Dr. Webb reports serving as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences.
• Dr.Walther reports no relevant conflicts of interest.
• Dr. Dewey is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences.

[ 本帖最后由 doctor2 于 2008-10-22 08:56 编辑 ]


来源: 医心网
上一篇:重磅|中国自主研发心血管OCT系统正式上市 助力PCI精准治疗
下一篇:[TCT2008]HORIZONS AMI试验1年结果
评论列表:(评论 0 )以下网友评论只代表网友个人观点,不代表本站观点。
最短5个字
登录     注册